Apple’s tax troubles
- The hindu editorial with vocab
September 16, 2016
The hefty (large in amount) €13 billion in
back taxes the
European Commission imposed on Apple should have drawn Europe and the U.S.
closer in their common quest to
crack down on corporate tax avoidance. But the unprecedented penalty to hit the American tech giant has triggered
angry outbursts at home and could
well put paid to hopes for transatlantic
cooperation, especially on the trade and investment partnership agreement,
in the immediate future. The latest ruling by the European Union competition
commissioner may not be the last against U.S. multinationals in what is
increasingly being viewed as harmful to tax diplomacy. As with the Starbucks decision in 2015 and the ongoing probe into McDonald’s,
both concerning two different countries, the Commission alleges that Ireland’s
ultra-low, single-digit tax arrangements with Apple were in violation of EU
state aid rules. Notably, the Commission has not taken issue with Dublin’s 12.5
per cent rate of corporate taxation. Curiously, the possibility of clawing back billions of euros,
estimated to be worth the country’s health-care budget for a year, is not an
attractive prospect for Dublin, home to hundreds of multinationals thriving on its decades-old foreign
direct investment policies that include low corporate taxation. Instead,
Ireland, which risks losing jobs, has resolved to appeal the decision along
with Apple, whose Irish subsidiaries account for 90 per cent of the company’s
overall profits.
On the other hand, there is no confusion on the other side of
the Atlantic on what the move by Brussels implies. U.S. politicians are piqued that a big chunk of the money —
that firms such as Apple may eventually have to pay European governments —
could instead have filled domestic coffers,
but for a domestic stumbling block.
This is the regulatory loophole that companies exploit to defer, indefinitely,
levies on profits from their overseas subsidiaries until they are repatriated. As matters stand, the 35
per cent tax rate in the U.S., compared to Ireland’s 12.5 per cent, is an
incentive for American firms to retain the advantage of the deferral clause.
Meanwhile, a 2014 regulation to curb
so-called corporate inversion, a manoeuvre(move/action) whereby American firms
relocate their headquarters to benign countries to trim domestic tax bills, is
said to have had limited effect in the absence of legislation. Global efforts
backed by more than 80 countries to combat
cross-border tax avoidance, known as Base Erosion and Profit Shifting, are
still at an early stage. EU action targeting individual corporations could well
be seen, at this juncture, as an irritant in that larger endeavour.
quest / / noun - a long search for something that is difficult
to find, or an attempt to achieve something difficult
unprecedented / adjective - never having happened or existed in the past
outburst / noun - a sudden forceful expression of
emotion, especially anger
transatlantic / / adjective - crossing the Atlantic
Ocean, or relating to countries on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean
claw sth back — phrasal verb - to
get possession of something again with difficulty
thrive / / verb - to grow, develop, or be successful
thriving //
adjective
pique // noun - a feeling of anger, especially
caused by damage to your feeling of being proud of yourself
piqued /
/ adjective
coffers [
plural]
the money that an organization has in its bank accounts
and available to spend
ˈstumbling
block noun- something that prevents action or
agreement
repatriate / verb - to send or bring
someone, or sometimes money or other property, back to their own country
curb // verb - to control or limit something that is not
wanted
combat / / verb -to try to stop something
unpleasant or harmful from happening or increasing
juncture / / noun - particular point in time
irritant / / noun (MAKING ANGRY)
- something that causes
trouble or makes you annoyed
endeavour UK (US endeavor )
/ noun [ C or U ] - an attempt to
do something
No comments:
Post a Comment